Quote:
Оriginally Postеd by Selnix
Two things about your signature. The I-stab makes it large so you are easier for people to lock and hit. It is also a bit behind the times my NEWSHIT spacefriend.
|
He's right scrappy‚ if you're ever using an iStab use best named not T2, as good an agility increase but less sig radius penalty. Personally i think a nanofiber in the fit mentioned would be better as the hull hp isn't resisted anyway so no big loss, you get faster aligns and faster base speed for mucho "omgomg they bubbled my rigged uninsured frigate and shadoo will shout at me for dying" avoidance ability.
What are the views on fits with no siege lanchers just for bombing? Those named launchers and the ACR rigs most people are packing cost a fair bit of the total build. Worth losing the flexibility of having torps to get a bit less isk lost and (undoubtably) more salvagers on field? Thats probably best answered by an FC.
Rocking this look myself;
[Purifier, Fleet Bomber]
Ballistic Control System II
Micro Auxiliary Power Core I
Nanofiber Internal Structure II
Medium F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction
Phased Weapon Navigation Array Generation Extron
1MN MicroWarpdrive II
'Arbalest' Siege Missile Launcher, Mjolnir Torpedo
'Arbalest' Siege Missile Launcher, Mjolnir Torpedo
'Arbalest' Siege Missile Launcher, Mjolnir Torpedo
Covert Оps Cloaking Dеvice II
Bomb Launcher I‚ Electron Bomb
Small Ancillary Current Router I
Small Warhead Calefaction Catalyѕt I
Thе MWD would be best named but cba to change it.